On today’s rhetorical devices test, was it easier to recognize devices from their definitions or identify them in quotations? Explain why, and discuss a device that challenged you, if any. What did this experience reveal about how well your study habits prepared you?

 

Answer:
On today's test, I think it was easier to recognize devices from quotes than from definitions. I think this is because when learning the devices in class, we looked at lots of examples of them and even practiced writing our own. The hardest part of the test, for me, was distinguishing the difference between analogy and allusion. Analogy is comparing something well-known to something not well-known, while allusion is referencing something well-known. On the test, I was confused when determining whether a quote was allusion or analogy.

Summary:
Today we took the rhetorical devices test.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Think about a time when you made a claim or gave an opinion, but someone asked you, "Why?" or "How do you know?" Describe the situation. What evidence did you use to support your point, and why is explaining your evidence just as important as providing it?

  Answer:  A claim I made before was that screen time is bad for health. This is because too much screens is bad for your eyesight, and it can affect your mental health. Many people who spend a lot of time on their phones suffer from depression or anxiety. Explaining your evidence is important because it helps really persuade the audience and get them to understand as best they can. Summary:  Today we read the short story "Ambush" by Tim O'Brien, a former soldier in the Vietnam War who has written many stories featuring war veterans and their experiences. Reflection:  In the story, the narrator talks about a soldier he killed as self-defense even though that soldier may not have been a threat. The story taught me how war can affect a soldier's life. They have to make hard decisions that may torment them the rest of their lives. 
Read more

Reflect on your experience in AP Language so far. What has been going well for you, what has been challenging, and what is one thing you need to improve moving forward?

  Answer:  So far, AP Lang is going pretty well for me. I understand all the material and how to use it to make arguments. It has been kind of challenging understanding how to come up with evidence when making a claim, but I'm figuring it out. Some things I need to improve are turning in all my blog posts and being faster and more efficient writing, so I'll be ready for the exam. Summary:  Today we wrote an argument paragraph about the short story, "Ambush," that we read on Wednesday, claiming either that there is or isn't such thing as a "good" kill. Reflection:  My position on the topic was that that some kills can be justified. As we discussed it as a class, I realized some of the opposing points were good too. Knowing that the counterargument had some good points helped me to make sure my argument was strong.
Read more

Write about something that you believed as a child.

  Answer:  When I was a kid, I believed that there were snakes in the monkey grass in our front yard. The monkey grass was tall and you couldn't see what was in it. My mom told my brother and I that there were snakes in it because she didn't want us to walk in it. Summary:  Today we learned about the three types of claims: claim of fact, claim of value, and claim of policy. Reflection:  I learned about the different types of claims and when and how to use them. This will help me when I'm trying to make a good argument. When you make an argument, you need a claim.
Read more